Does not the Claim of being Christ’s follower mean putting Christ first? Of course it does.

The United States is just about as far from being a Christian nation as men can get.

Even the American Religions, their leaders cannot be Christ’s men for Is it not, Travesty that men go the Church to give their money to worldly men who only give lip service to the lord, and when it comes to the division of mammon the truth is shown, that they do NOT love their neighbors as much as they love themselves?

A Christian nation, of people so intoxicated on the knowledge of good and evil that they justify returning evil for evil, calling the evil they do, GOOD. Intoxicated people who sow evil in almost everything they do, even allowing their leaders to use constitutionally forbidden fruits, the power to construe to deny or disparage liberties of the people, to invent without authority trespasses for them to punish instead of forgive. All to feed the unregulated greed of commerce. From taking countless trillions of dollars out of their open market to be used in the creation and continued funding of drug cartels. To taking by force the powers of free men, so that our servants can now reach into the pockets of the people without due process of law and levy money to private commerce, armed robbery of law by another name. To force upon the people the concept that when people get into a car their trust cannot be placed in GOD they must instead feed greed.

A nation of people who base their power among men on the amount of evil they can do, this is their christian nation! As educated men they know what is coming! Americans are now sowing more evil than ever before, and our children’s, children will reap it, ten fold. A Travesty of doing unto others! Ever Increasing the amount of evil doers on earth!

However, the greatest travesty of all has to be their belief that the grace of Jesus Christ will cover those who stand against Him, as their King!

Americans sowed evil in manipulating the balance of power in the middle east. Their leaders did. They cried foul when evil is what they reaped. Americans choose to sow greater and greater amounts of evil? And oh hey, guess what WE reap!

I pray for the men who stand on the wall, but they stand there, for the sins of their leaders!

The Free mans position on, what makes a Domestic enemy of our constitution, is this:

Abuse of power. Usurpation of the Powers secured to the people by the tenth amendment, pursuant to the citations of Authority made by the members of the first supreme court of John Locke and what He says about our legal form of government: "whenever the legislators endeavour to take away, and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people...Whensoever therefore the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society; and either by ambition, fear, folly or corruption, endeavour to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other, an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people; by this breach of trust they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands"

Examples of corrupting the legal point of view by interpreting the powers secured to the people;

The people in government positions who used the power of the tyrant to give themselves the power to strip their services away from the tax payers so that they could be sold back to them.

The people in government positions who construe that the power of the tyrant can be used in place of due process of law. So that they can construe to deny and /or disparage all of the things they are forbidden the power to do under the due process of law of our legal form of government.

Is that not what treason is in these United States?

"Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain every thing they have no need of particular reservations. "WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ORDAIN and ESTABLISH this Constitution for the United States of America.'' Here is a better recognition of popular rights, than volumes of those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our State bills of rights, and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics than in a constitution of government."  ~~~Alexander Hamilton fp #84~~~

Zech 14:13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour. This has come about now, even people claiming to be Christian sit on juries and return evil for evil, even calling the harm they do "good". Rationalization plays no part in what treatment of our neighbors trespasses of law are loving/caring/helpful and what is hurtful to them. Evil people think they are worthy to judge after Christ said we are all criminals and not worthy to judge other sinners.

Evil people throw great weights of punishment where the salvation of their soul requires them to say GO, and sin no more

It is for rebellion against the one commandment of Christ (Love as HE Loved) that unforgiving people "fruity users" will not pass through the fire. Christ already named them fools in Matthew 7 they cry Lord, Lord, but he knows them not for they hear His words but do not do them. They worship only with their mouth but their heart is with the bodies of unforgiving, oath breaking mammals that make up our earthly governments.

I propose that it may be possible at this time to run

An evolutionary test of Biblical proportions.

A test which will indicate if the Biblical end of the time of man is truly upon us now.

If our knowledge of the fundamental principals of government is correct, according to Americas first supreme court members, and John Locke was just, in concluding that legislators and judges who over step the boundaries set by constitutions and disparage liberties from the people are guilty of acts of war against the society they swore to protect. And if armed rebellion against the liberties of citizens of a sovereign authority creates a state of war.

Then since the claim is in that the Kingdom of Heaven planted the flag of their nation on planet earth in the beginning it is sovereign over all mammalian societies. Also based on the Biblical doctrine of Jesus the Christ that mankind can get complete forgiveness from their judges. And the fact that the Oregon Legislature is now limiting the amount of leniency (forgiveness) that our elected Judges can give to the citizens of Heaven residing in their part of the Kingdom.

The spirit through me now gives you a true litmus test for the end of times. OR NOT!

When confronted by the truth;

Honest people will repent and end their war with as little damage done as possible.

Dishonest people will deny everything that makes them look bad and continue doing evil.

For the Biblical end of times to come true evil oath breakers have to take over positions of power in societies of man, people who will even steal liberties from the people who hire them. And the Body of mammals must become anti to the Lord of this planet Jesus the Christ.

Has it happened already?

If when confronted those who govern are found to be honest people,

then the end times are not here yet.

If however those who govern are found to be less than honest.

Woe be unto this generation for honest people are about to be Revelationed.

Sincerely

Rev. TJStarfire

I believe that I have shown beyond any reasonable doubt that "We the People" was/is, a political entity created to form a more perfect government. Separate and distinct from all of the other sovereign spheres of action and that "We the People" granted only limited powers to government. Evidenced by chief Justice Marshall 17US316, article 5's declaration of due process of law, the 9^th, and 10^th amendments. This is a Nation of Free people and "We the People" retained political powers as claimed by the 10^th amendment, where it declares that powers not granted to the united states or forbidden to the states are still secured to the people by the federal constitution. Furthermore, that under the 14^th amendment "We the People" did not grant unlimited sovereignty even to the states.

At the time the constitution was put before the people they were told by their legislators that they surrendered none of their liberties to those who govern. For their votes the people were sold the ideal that every thing the people could freely do while they are going about their liberties was originally secured, to themselves and to their [posterity]. If this is fraud then so is the foundation of government. This concept was at first enforced by general understanding, but later put into writing as the 14^th amendment. Section 1. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.". DUE PROCESS of LAW that starts with Article 5 of our constitution when: "on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments" to alter the powers secured to "We the People". We are legally entitled to equal protection under the laws of our states. Our legal liberties being constitutionally secured to ourselves and to our posterity cannot legally vary from state to state. All new things arising with time having to do with liberties belong first to free people, every member of society, until legally granted by due process of law. And while due process of law lies open there can be NO legal excuse for not using it, by either the federal or state governments.

The power to limit forgiveness has never been granted to government by "We the People" and neither the federal government nor a single state has enough sovereignty to alter the federal constitution. Amendments can only be legal when granted by the parties of the first part.

This is not a conglomerate of separate nations. This is one Nation, under GOD, indivisible, with liberty and justice legally secured to ALL. The power of "We the People" with the agreement from the legislators of the states bound all, and still binds all today.

Punishment must be tempered with forgiveness or there is no justice. Therefore, while setting punishment for crimes falls within the legal spheres of action of our legislators. Minimum sentencing cannot, the right to receive forgiveness from all levels of government must remain within the sphere of action secured to "We the People", for the use by our judicial branches.

Not only the supreme or the federal courts but also those of all our lesser courts.

I have shown where, for their votes "We the People" were sold the promise that our courts would stand between the legislators and the power of the people to keep the legislators in their own spheres of action.

All in am asking is for you to do your legal duty to this society of free people. Strike down all rebellious acts against our legal form of government.

As it would appear that the Oregon Judicial oath of office to support and defend the national constitution of the United States of America (A.D. 1789), requires you to do.

I realize that my stand is a difficult one after a hundred years of the convolution of laws allowing insurrections against our legal form of government, by unrepentant stone throwing sinners, the lovers of money and usurpers of power, after Judges were granted immunity from prosecution for "even grave injustices". I know that I am fighting an uphill battle, while standing on a slippery slope, and that all I am appt to gain here is a judgement that can be appealed to higher courts.

However, someone must stand the ground that so many have given their lives for already.

This nation of free people must have justice to survive, free air to breath. There is a leak in our liberties, in fact there are now many leaks in our better form of government, you have the legal power to cap these leaks, please do this before the whole ocean becomes polluted. All of us little fish are already gasping for the air of freedoms lost and in frustration striking out at all around us. Please stand your ground, reconnect the air supply to our legal form of government before this nation gets torn apart and dies a violent death.

The best example of corruption in our government comes when levied gunmen strip "We the People" of the presumption of innocence just to get into a courtroom.

What do we call three hundred million counts of armed robbery of rights?

Article 3 Section. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

I want to present a legal question about how the legislators of a single state can disparage the liberty of the United States citizens in receiving forgiveness/leniency from our elected Judges?

I claim that the 14^th amendment’s: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States" is the legal law of this land, and claim that; over my lifetime as a natural citizen of these United States and in more than one state, I have had the privilege of being granted leniency and twice being given complete forgiveness from trespassing on minor infractions of the law. I claim that has always been a right and privilege of all U.S. citizens.

I claim that, these people who are elected to govern in this state, are not reading the laws of our land form the only legal point of view that serving a blind justice requires of them as a duty to this society of free people."The government of the Union, then ( whatever may be the influence of this fact on the case), is, [17 U.S. 316, 405] emphatically and truly, a government of the people. In form, and in substance, it emanates from them. Its powers are granted by them, and are to be exercised directly on them, and for their benefit." ~ Chief Justice Marshall ~

In my not so humble opinion the loss of any scrap of forgiveness that I might be tossed does not benefit me, nor do I think that it would benefit any of my neighbors, not the ones outside of government anyway. And I must stand with Justice Brandies on this: "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding." (277us 438) Justice Brandies, dissenting.

Furthermore, every liberty that is taken away from people who think they are free, without asking, by due process of law, finds many other citizens like me who are loath to give up the things that we could freely do and receive, while we were about our liberties, not without a fight. The number of angry disillusioned citizens whose ability to trust in government has been undermined increases every day. We are lucky, so far, that mankind is more disposed to suffer evils, while the evils are sufferable. However, all history shows those with eyes to see, that within human societies there is a weight in numbers, that can break the camels back. A critical number of citizens loathing losses of some liberty, that can tip the scale of justice, which is balanced on the perceptions of those who are being governed. Then the people rise up to put down the unwarranted invasions into society’s Greatest sovereign sphere of action by right of conquest and constitution secured to "WE THE PEOPLE".

If fraud was not used in obtaining our constitution then: "Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain every thing they have no need of particular reservations. "WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ORDAIN and ESTABLISH this Constitution for the United States of America.'' Here is a better recognition of popular rights, than volumes of those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our State bills of rights, and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics than in a constitution of government." ~~Alexander Hamilton fp#84~~, is now part of understanding the fundamental laws of our land.

As long as our Judges and peace officers continue to put force of arms behind these legislated invasions into the legal sphere of action in which society as a whole body constitutionally secured every thing that We the people could freely do while We are going about our liberties, "to ourselves and to our posterity", the security of our society is put at risk from citizens loathing the loss of their liberties to domestic enemies of our constitution.

If the U.S. government has a legal foundation then: "It is far more rational to suppose, that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority." ~Alexander Hamilton fp78~

And I now move the court, that this legislated act of rebellion against our society’s control, over our access to forgiveness from the members of society, We elect to judge us, be struck down. On the grounds that no one state has enough sovereignty to alter anything forbidden to them by the federal constitutional contract.

Since I am now paying more attention to what has been going on in this country I find that our courts no longer record arguments presented in the courts. Since, if it is needed I wish to appeal this argument to the supreme level I must put all of my arguments in writing now. SO I will point out why judges must strike down laws that overstep the boundaries set by constitutions.

To support the first claim I remind the court that in western societies forgiveness has been required at the core of our beings since it is reported that the Biblical GOD, King of the universe granted all judgement to His Son, the forgiver of all trespasses, Jesus Christ. (John 5:22)

I have a couple of more gripes to lay before the court now. The First of these being that, when I came at the appointed time for my ordered "court appearance" as stated on the ticket. The person who legally convened said court was not even competent enough to move proceedings along without requiring that I commit fraud by claiming not to be guilty of going over the speed limit. I resent this type of treatment and loath the guards of our liberties for allowing citizens of these United States to be treated in this manner when dealing with those citizens who have sworn themselves to serving our society.

Furthermore, I was not asked to wave time in any legal manner, nor did I wave time when I entered my plea. As a result, Reasonable time will have expired on prosecuting my lead foot this time. Now upon further study I find that my right to speak in my own defense has been infringed upon by another act of rebellion against the constitution and my right to refuse consent has been legislated away from me, even when it is not in my best interest to consent. This cannot be inside the legal laws of this land. I AM A FREE MAN with the freedom to speak to my own defense and I say this cannot be legally levied away from me against my best interests. And most certainly not by the limited amount of sovereignty held by any single state.

I now go further and claim that every member of society "We the people" being parties of the first part by right of posterity in the federal constitutional contract are protected from domestic rebellions from those who govern by: Article 3 section 3 "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." .

I claim that, "Them" cannot not be reasonably read as pertaining to only 13 of the 14 the parties of the first part. We the People, society as a whole have a legal voice and a legal sovereign sphere of action, secured to ourselves and to our posterity by way of conventions of the people in each of their several states. Therefore, When, legislators while due process of law lies open before them to legally alter the powers granted to government, (Article 5), levy money to hire thousands of gunmen, who in turn support their disparaging usurpation of legal power and liberties belonging to society as a whole, as per the 10^th amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." war is levied against them. Only citizens wielding governments power to levy money to provide force of arms can engineer treason.

Usurpation=theft. Theft supported by force of arms= armed robbery. Theft supported by thousands of armed robbers, With thousands of counts of injured united states citizens, all with the same effect of isolating them from justice, and enslaving them to arbitrary powers of despotism constitutes war being waged on them. If We the People have any legal protection at all from domestic enemies of the constitution then, all the afore mentioned acts, the disparaging of forgiveness, rebellion against convening a legal court when the people receive a notice to appear before one and the outright theft of the right to refuse consent to the government holding a trespass over a person for an unreasonable amount of time, rise to a level that constitutes treason against our legal form of government.

The legal basis for this can be traced back through the federalist papers to the fundamental principals of common law, and John Locke’s second treatise on government section 222 "The reason why men enter into society, is the preservation of their property; and the end why they chuse and authorize a legislative, is, that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the members of the society, to limit the power, and moderate the dominion, of every part and member of the society: for since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society, that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure, by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making; whenever the legislators endeavour to take away, and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people"

Only our Judges, if they do their duty to society, can derail a train of treason, without the use of force of arms. By striking down laws that rebel against obedience to the power of the people to place binding limitations on the members of society elected to govern. However, when Judges adhere to, or give aid, they to climb on the train, we the people are left in tyranny and the supporters of a rebellion along with the levied gunmen are all guilty of treason against the United States. Furthermore, our legal form of government cannot support rebellions against itself. When judges refuse to strike down rebellions and allow sovereign spheres of action to be assaulted and robbed of power by force of arms rather than by due process of law while that lies open, the train of treason grows long and heavy with counts of lawlessness and drags society down into the depths of despair causing them to turn to mind altering drugs for an escape. Creating a catch 22, was a smart move for domestic enemies of society seeking despotic power.

But far from the best interests of a society of free people.

All of our federal courts, even the members of the supreme court are only parties of the second part to our constitutional contract. They can only hold office during good behaviour, and are forbidden to give the appearance of wrongdoing. They can, if they use their own will instead of honest judgement, easily become guilty of rebellion or treason through bad behaviour, if they were to do some thing the constitution forbids or if they adhere to legislators who do some thing the constitution forbids. They cannot alter our legal form of government, inside the law. That power is secured to the parties of the first part. And the State courts even though they represent a party of the first part, those parties relinquished the power to alter the federal constitution to a 3/4s majority of the states and to all things forbidden by it.

For example if any justice were to violate; Article 1 section 1 "All legislative Powers herein granted..." or adhered to legislators who violate Article 5's due process of law while due process of law lies open, or allow the states to violate the 14^th amendment "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States". Those things would not only give the appearance of wrongdoing. If they were to do those things they would be stealing rights and powers out of the sovereign sphere of action retained by conquest and constitution to the members of society as a whole. That would in fact alter our legal form of government, a power never granted and therefore undermine the peoples ability to trust in their government.

Acts of any Judge which can be reasonably construed as war or treason cannot be "good behaviour" or used to set precedent to steel from the people while due process of law lies open.

If the United States has a legal foundation or government a legal leg to stand on then, the people were not lied to, and this is the fundamental principals that govern the actions of the elected:

I do not refer to case law much because no power has been granted by which our servants can alter our legal form of government while due process of law lies open to them. Due process of law to get the proper warrants from the parties of the first part to alter the things secured within their sovereign spheres of action. However, prudence suggests that I point out what Chief Justice Marshall pointed out in [17 U.S. 316] "If any one proposition could command the universal assent of mankind, we might expect it would be this-that the government of the Union, though limited in its powers, is supreme within its sphere of action." Our governments are only sovereign within their sovereign spheres of action. So are the member of a society of free people, "We the People". Our governments have no legal authority to enter or remove any thing from the sovereign sphere of action secured to ourselves and to our posterity without receiving warrant by due process of law from the legal voice of our sphere of action. Spoken only by an agreement from at least 3/4s of conventions of the people outside of government in each of their several states. This is not called the land of the free without reason.

ALL of our Judges must do their duty to society or the people are left facing tyrannical powers of domestic enemies which in their rebellions against obedience to the legal laws of this land undermine the peoples ability to trust to the point where the number of honest citizens loathing the loss of their liberties reaches the breaking point and the United States follows Russia into civil wars with We the People fighting against the domestic enemies of our constitution.

Arizona Dreaming.

I dropped into a church, I passed along the way.....;)

And GOD said;

If the United States has a legal foundation.

Then fraud was not used to get the people to accept the constitution.

Furthermore, if one state has enough sovereignty to alter the liberties of the citizens secured by the federal constitution. Then is it not far more prudent that they limit the amount of taxation the people have to pay to the federal government?

That means every legal citizen stopped and required to prove citizenship has had a common law act of war committed against them, Further still, the gunman that did that is guilty of treason against innocent until proven guilty. And in the eyes of Christ these domestic enemies of our constitution are unrepentant stone throwing sinners, dead men walking.

The stain of dishonor our elected officials have put on every seat in our government is beyond belief. Instead of doing their duty to regulate commerce for the benefit of our society as a whole, they have legalized their own taking of graft from those they are sworn to regulate. Just look at the disasters We the People are now facing one after another. Failure to regulate banking destroyed our economy, and look at what the failure to pass the bill requiring backup blowout prevention on oil rigs gave us. What have our elected officials done? They have put a cap on the responsibilities commerce has to our society for the damages they cause to us. They promise the people healthcare and then turn on us and try to economically enslave every member of society to the people in commerce who are paying to keep them in power.

Doing commerce in this nation is not a right, people must contract with government to do it. Therefore, it is only a privilege and one that should be removed from the people who abuse it, if we are to have any justice at all in our society.

All of the stains of dishonor, from the first lie ever told by a legislator, the first liberty stolen from We the People, to the very next breath taken by the present legislators to make some non binding "contract with America", still remain on each seat in our government as a concomitant of their actions, left by the responsibility of public office for the next person taking that seat.

The dishonor that has built up on every seat in our government is far beyond the power of any one person or even any small group of people, to erase. Now it is time for the people to rise up and through the first step in due process of law, (Article 5) make alterations to our legal form of government. In order to among other things place better guards against individuals dishonoring the powers of our society and better secure our posterity from unwarranted invasions into the sovereign sphere of action constitutionally secured to we the people outside of government.

This is a nation of free people but we are being overrun by unrepentant stone throwing sinners, domestic enemies of our constitution who while due process of law lies open, use usurpation of power to alter liberties, enemies of obedience to the fundamental laws of this land, enemies of telling people they serve the truth, enemies of the laws of both GOD and man, and oath breakers who are undermining honest peoples ability to trust in government.

It is time for the tea parties to call forth conventions of the people outside of government, to put an end this corruption, clean up the seats of our government and bring the ability to put trust in those who govern back into our society.

#1 To error is human, stop law suits punishing people for being human. Especially medical personal working in good conscious to help their fellow citizens.

Treat all members of society equally as required by law. Instead of just protecting the citizens working for government from law suits, as per the present management.

#2 To protect the weaker members of society we must muzzle the dog eat dog members, and the unrepentant stone throwing sinners.

Being free people means that we hold the legal power over the things that we can freely do while we are going about our liberties. It does not mean that some members of our society should be allowed to feast off of the flesh of the lives of the wounded and elderly members of society

We the people, gave the people we elect to manage our society, the power to regulate commerce.

As long as there is one person practicing commerce in this country, who is taking more money out of our society than we give the President, there is no just reason for the managers to come asking We the People for more money. And Corporations large enough to give the appearance that they can sway the influence of their regulators can no longer be allowed the ability to do so.

In fact even allowing large corporations to exist at all is counter productive to achieving a society of people being created equal since it concentrates control of commerce to less and less individual members

#3 The Whims of the few, should never affect the freedoms of the many.

Outside of constitutions, there is no law put on the books by former Legislators that cannot be removed by one vote of the present legislators. Every law on the books today is there only at the whim of the present people filling that office. Congress is never tied to the ways of the past, except by the minds of the type of people who setup the present system to feed the greed of the people seeking power in government.

The apparent result of these servants taking money from commerce for themselves, is unequal exchange rates for services rendered that are taking we the People, into slavery to a union between these rebels in positions of government and those in commerce.

Effectively economically enslaving every citizen to both.

It is good and proper that Free people are indebted to their society.

However, being enslaved to other members of society is unacceptable.

To set the record straight, The sovereign sphere of action belonging to the members of society, that was originally split to create the sovereign spheres of action granted to our different branches of government, IS still sovereign to ALL. Governmental spheres of action are forbidden to construe to deny, disparage. and no one state having enough sovereignty to alter this constitution. A sovereign sphere of action whose sovereign voice can only be spoken by a 3/4 agreement between conventions of the people outside of government in each of their several states.

In any society that has even one greedy member, the only way to spread out money is a ceiling on income with a 100% tax. All people being treated equal in the society.

America is finally getting its comeuppance.

The First Black person elected President, is also the first President to permanently, with monthly payment to entities of commerce, economically enslave, by law, every member of our society, to private companies, with no hope of ever being free people again.

ALL common law, acts of war against any constitutional society.

Our legal form of government does NOT stand behind any of the rebels even if they do retain delegated power. After abusing it, they are only domestic enemies of the constitution. Under the legal laws of this land it is treason against our legal form of government to adhere to anything they do or give them any aid or comfort.

AMENDMENT XXVIII Originally proposed Jan. 1, 2010

For any society to be truly free its full voice must be heard. In this meltingpot Nation every voice that might be held legally accountable as an adult must be heard,

from the scum clear down to the dregs.

Therefore, there is NO Right to vote.

Voting is an inviolate Duty of Membership, no different than the duty to stay within ones own sphere of action must be in a society of free peoples.

AMENDMENT I XXX Originally proposed Jan. 1 2010

To set the record straight, The sovereign sphere of action belonging to the members of society, that was originally split to create the sovereign spheres of action granted to our different branches of government, IS sovereign to ALL, governments spheres forbidden to deny, disparage or abridge and no one state having enough sovereignty to alter this constitution.

A sphere whose sovereign voice can only be spoken by conventions of the people outside of government in each of their several states.

["Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain every thing they have no need of particular reservations. "WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ORDAIN and ESTABLISH this Constitution for the United States of America.'' Here is a better recognition of popular rights, than volumes of those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our State bills of rights, and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics than in a constitution of government." federalist papers #84]

1. We the People surrender nothing, everything that citizens can freely do while they are about their liberties, every thing about their lives, including the amount of danger a citizen can face or deal deadly force to repel and everything about their property are secured within their sovereign sphere of action until, by due process of law, permission to deny or diminish is granted by their legal voice, conventions of ourselves.

AMENDMENT XXX originally proposed Jan. 1 2010

to protect the sovereign sphere of action belonging to the members of this society it is recognized from the fundamental principals of government, for the record, that: "The reason why men enter into society, is the preservation of their property; and the end why they chuse and authorize a legislative, is, that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the members of the society, to limit the power, and moderate the dominion, of every part and member of the society: for since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society, that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure, by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making; whenever the legislators endeavour to take away, and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge, which God hath provided for all men, against force and violence. Whensoever therefore the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society; and either by ambition, fear, folly or corruption, endeavour to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other, an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people; by this breach of trust they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the people, who. have a right to resume their original liberty, and, by the establishment of a new legislative, (such as they shall think fit) provide for their own safety and security, which is the end for which they are in society. What I have said here, concerning the legislative in general, holds true also concerning the supreme executor, who having a double trust put in him, both to have a part in the legislative, and the supreme execution of the law, acts against both, when he goes about to set up his own arbitrary will as the law of the society. He acts also contrary to his trust, when he either employs the force, treasure, and offices of the society, to corrupt the representatives, and gain them to his purposes; or openly preengages the electors, and prescribes to their choice, such, whom he has, by sollicitations, threats, promises, or otherwise, won to his designs; and employs them to bring in such, who have promised before-hand what to vote, and what to enact. Thus to regulate candidates and electors, and new-model the ways of election, what is it but to cut up the government by the roots, and poison the very fountain of public security? for the people having reserved to themselves the choice of their representatives, as the fence to their properties, could do it for no other end, but that they might always be freely chosen, and so chosen, freely act, and advise, as the necessity of the common-wealth, and the public good should, upon examination, and mature debate, be judged to require. This, those who give their votes before they hear the debate, and have weighed the reasons on all sides, are not capable of doing. To prepare such an assembly as this, and endeavour to set up the declared abettors of his own will, for the true representatives of the people, and the law-makers of the society, is certainly as great a breach of trust, and as perfect a declaration of a design to subvert the government, as is possible to be met with. To which, if one shall add rewards and punishments visibly employed to the same end, and all the arts of perverted law made use of, to take off and destroy all that stand in the way of such a design, and will not comply and consent to betray the liberties of their country, it will be past doubt what is doing. What power they ought to have in the society, who thus employ it contrary to the trust went along with it in its first institution, is easy to determine; and one cannot but see, that he, who has once attempted any such thing as this, cannot any longer be trusted." John Locke

AMENDMENT XXX I Originally proposed Jan. 2010

We do hereby place the duty of protecting the sovereign sphere of action belonging to the members of this society to the Department of Homeland Security. The only punishment for domestic enemy combatants invading the liberties of the people by indirect means, shall be public executions.